Singapore Ge2020 the Long View on Ceca and Other Free Trade Agreements

Singapore GE2020: The Long View on CECA and Other Free Trade Agreements

The recently concluded Singapore General Elections 2020 (GE2020) have given a renewed focus on the city-state`s position on free trade agreements (FTAs) and how they affect various aspects of Singaporean society. One of the most contentious issues in this regard is the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) signed with India in 2005.

CECA is a bilateral agreement between Singapore and India that aims to eliminate tariffs on goods and services, enhance investment flows, and promote greater economic cooperation. While the agreement has been praised for its potential to boost trade and investment between the two countries, it has also faced criticism from certain quarters who claim that it has led to Indian nationals taking away jobs from locals and depressing wages.

The issue has come to the fore in the GE2020 campaign, with opposition parties and civil society groups calling for a review of CECA and its impact on Singaporeans. The ruling People`s Action Party (PAP), on the other hand, has defended the agreement, saying that it has brought significant benefits to both countries and that any concerns over its impact on Singapore`s workforce are misplaced.

Beyond CECA, Singapore has signed many other FTAs with various countries and blocs, including the United States, European Union, China, and ASEAN. These agreements have opened up new opportunities for Singaporean businesses and provided consumers with access to a wider range of goods and services at more competitive prices.

However, they have also raised concerns over issues such as environmental and labour standards, intellectual property rights, and investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. Critics argue that some of these agreements do not provide adequate safeguards to protect Singapore`s interests and may lead to a loss of sovereignty and policy autonomy.

Given the complexity and diversity of these issues, it is essential to take a long-term view of Singapore`s FTA strategy and ensure that it is aligned with the country`s overall economic and social objectives. This requires a careful balancing of the benefits and risks of each agreement and a willingness to engage in open and transparent dialogue with all stakeholders.

For instance, while FTAs such as CECA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) may offer significant economic benefits in terms of trade and investment, they also have social and political implications that need to be taken into account. Similarly, agreements such as the Paris Agreement on climate change or the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples may require Singapore to rethink certain aspects of its economic policies and practices.

In conclusion, Singapore`s FTA strategy must be viewed in the context of a broader vision of economic and social development that takes into account the interests of all Singaporeans. While FTAs can be powerful tools for enhancing economic growth and prosperity, they must be pursued in a manner that is sustainable, equitable, and respectful of Singapore`s sovereignty and national identity.

Scroll to Top